Talk:Pakistan Air Force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pakistan Air Force article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / National / Asian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Unverified report on F-16 count by US

The count of PAF F16 by US has been denied by US defense department itself. So adding the info saying the f16 numbers have been verified shouldn't be entertained based on article on an magazine. We have to wait for a word from US defense officials itself.

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

What is the basis of so called independent sources mentioned in so many places..the loser was paf and yet IAF bore much more damages .is this even logical?? 2409:40E7:66:39D:40F2:8CFF:FEC2:A171 (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 22:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of Pakistan using F-16 is not well sourced

>>>Pakistan would later go on to accept that F-16s had been used, but maintained that none of them were shot down.

The article linked does not state what the sentence above claims, and further, it does not indicate any actual source other than vague references to ISPR (without any sourcing itself), further the Tribune is a well known yellow journalism Hindu Extremist mouthpiece. The sentence should be deleted as it is not verifiable, the article does not state what the sentence claims it does, and overall it comes from a poor source. 47.161.33.43 (talk) 17:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very bland layout of article/Lack of pictures

I want to ask that more pictures be added to this article, especially colourful or dynamic ones. The layout and display of this article really looks very bland and boring and more pictures would brighten it up.